brought to you by Chalat Hatten & Koupal

Chalat Hatten &
Koupal PC


1900 Grant Street, Suite 1050
Denver, Colorado 80203

800.221.5526

attorney@skilaw.com

www.skisafety-blog.com
www.chalatlaw.com

 

Survey of Ski Law in the United States


by James H. Chalat
ALASKA ARIZONA CALIFORNIA COLORADO
CONNECTICUT IDAHO ILLINOIS KENTUCKY
MAINE MASSACHUSETTS MICHIGAN MINNESOTA
MISSOURI MONTANA NEVADA NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA OHIO OREGON PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND SOUTH DAKOTA TENNESSEE TEXAS
UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING

To read cases specific to a particular state, click the state name, above.


SOUTH DAKOTA - 2006

No ski safety statute, but some regulation at local level has been attempted (see Rantapaa, below). Statutory assumption of risks "inherent in the sport of snowmobiling" at S.D. Codified Laws § 32-20A-21, together with ordinary motor vehicle regulations. General recreational use statute protecting landowners at § 20-9-14.

Cases

An 11-year-old was injured when struck by an expert skier at the intersection of a trail. Guardian ad litem brought suit alleging negligent design and operation by ski area. Jury was instructed on common law negligence, as well as on a county ordinance prohibiting suit arising from the inherent risks of skiing. In settling an indirect challenge to the validity of the local ordinance, the court held the jury instructions improper on multiple grounds, including that the local ordinance: 1) barred a claim available under preemptive state law, and 2) improperly shifted burden of proof on assumption of risk defense defendant to plaintiff. Rantapaa v. Black Hills Chair Lift Co., 633 N.W.2d 196 (S.D. 2001).