brought to you by Chalat Hatten & Koupal

Chalat Hatten &
Koupal PC


1900 Grant Street, Suite 1050
Denver, Colorado 80203

800.221.5526

attorney@skilaw.com

www.skisafety-blog.com
www.chalatlaw.com

 

Survey of Ski Law in the United States


by James H. Chalat
ALASKA ARIZONA CALIFORNIA COLORADO
CONNECTICUT IDAHO ILLINOIS KENTUCKY
MAINE MASSACHUSETTS MICHIGAN MINNESOTA
MISSOURI MONTANA NEVADA NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA OHIO OREGON PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND SOUTH DAKOTA TENNESSEE TEXAS
UTAH VERMONT VIRGINIA WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA WISCONSIN WYOMING

To read cases specific to a particular state, click the state name, above.


KENTUCKY - 2006

Cases

In Stivers v. Ellington, 140 S.W.3d 599 (Ky. Ct. App. 2004), reasoning cited with approval by Hargis v. Baise, 168 S.W.3d 36 (Ky. 2005), a snowboarder brought suit on basis of Colorado Ski Safety Act and injuries sustained when defendant skier collided with her on a Colorado slope. At issue was whether to apply statute of limitations for negligence actions, or longer statute of limitations for liability created by statute ("negligence per se.") In deciding that the Colorado act did not create any new liability, the court declared that negligence per se is nothing more than "a negligence claim with a statutory standard of care substituted for the common law standard of care." Edward F. Heimbrock Co., Inc. v. Marine Sales and Service, Inc., 766 S.W.2d 70 (Ky. Ct. App. 1989). Employer was denied recovery in suit against another company alleged to have negligently repaired and adjusted skis and bindings, causing debilitating injury to their sales employee, causing them pecuniary loss.